Historical and sociological forces
unique to each gender cause disparities in the relationship to the body between
men and women. Most of us, including the artist of the above cartoon, are
likely to agree on that fact even before reading Young's work. As can be implied from the image, because we live
in a world where a woman’s value is still associated with her appearance,
societal beauty standards have the power to cause healthy, attractive women to
feel overweight and self-confident in a way that men with the same body mass
index would never imagine feeling.
Observations
such as this serve as the basis for Young’s explanation on why many have
incorrectly perceived the phenomenon of throwing a ball “like a girl” to be the
product of a “natural feminine essence”. Her theory, as I understand it, is
thus: (1) Society’s sexist objectification of the female body causes women to
literally “objectify” themselves, coming to view their own bodies as objects
separate from the experiences that their bodies create. (2) This conscious
awareness of the body as a separate entity from the psyche, coupled with social
conditioning that steers females away from male-gendered activities, actually
changes the way in which many of their bodies operate in the three-dimensional world.
In short, she posits that differences in bodily existence for each gender are
based primarily on differences in cultural status between men and women—she
maintains that there is no natural feminine essence.
The
following video presents an example of how differences in gendered bodily
existence might be assumed natural by society:
Based on
this, it would seem that women might be more predisposed to hurting themselves
with a powerful gun. Even if we ignore the complexities of a statement like
that and assume it to be true, however, the question remains, why would women be more likely to cause
themselves harm from an improper bodily technique? Some would argue that women’s
hands are naturally more delicate, which is why they have such a hard
time. If Young is to be believed,
however, it is more likely to be because the women have been socialized into
such a position. They have been told constantly that they are fragile or they
have had little experience with a gun, and perhaps for these reasons, they
assume they are not really in control of their physical situation (which can explain why they have difficulty performing the task).
The short
video for today, “Men Throwing Rocks with the Other Hand,” further exemplifies
how this could be so. When men throw with their non-dominant hand, it presents
a form that is “unnatural” in appearance, similar to the way that girls are
said to throw normally. This emphasizes that even men do not throw great
naturally, but rather were conditioned to do so through their relationship with
their social environment. We know women have been historically discouraged from
doing perceivably masculine activities, so how could we expect them to perform bodily techniques in the same way as their male counterparts if they have not
been socialized in the same way?
The
larger implication of Young’s theory seems to be that gender is
socially constructed just as much as race, sexuality, or any other
non-biological identifier. The fact that in everyday life, one bathroom has a
dress on the door and one does not is because we as a society have created an “essential”
difference between men and women that is not naturally essential. We already
knew that this distinction had huge effects on the social realm as well as how men and
women viewed their bodies, but now we have learned that the pervasiveness of
such a division extends even into the way that our bodies function in physical
space.

Very nice and concise connection between the videos and Young's piece. Your explanation, without all of Young's "wordage", helps to focus what the argument is trying to say. It goes without saying how the powers of socialization can have a profound effect on individuals and society. Are things only natural because that's how we've always known them? More specifically, is it because that's what society tells us is natural. You'd hope that if this notion became more widespread and popular, it would change the landscape of how society functions and challenge common, often ignorant assumptions. Also, the fact this socialization process affects how are bodies physically function is striking. While one carries out a particular function they are under the assumption it is a type of naturalness, but it is in fact what society has unconsciously communicated to them to do, which seems a bit scary.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree with your comment in reaction to the video, "Men Throwing Rocks with the Other Hand". Males are raised from the time they were children to throw things, whether it be a football, baseball, rock, etc. Every father dreams of the day he gets to play "catch" with his son, and I think that is the social conditioning you are talking about. Very rarely do you see young girls throwing baseballs or footballs with their fathers, because it is simply out of the social norm. Therefore when girls grow older they don't have as much conditioning or practice of the proper technique in throwing a ball, which is why society continues to believe that women are naturally more fragile. It is a vicious cycle in society that will probably go on for decades.
ReplyDeleteI think that you did a very good job in analyzing these pieces, and agree with Darin in that you cut down on the “wordage” to help make a more clear concise argument. What really stuck for me was actually watching the video, “Men Throwing Rocks with the Other Hand” after doing these readings. It put the words I had read in Young’s piece into real concrete evidence for me. It helped me to think beyond what Young was claiming about female’s throwing action on paper, and showed me. What society tells us is “right” or “normal” really isn't what is right or should be. It is amazing how so many things can be shaped by our social environment, and I also agree with what Darin said again, that it is also a bit scary.
ReplyDeleteYour question, "how could we expect them (females) to perform bodily techniques in the same way as their male counterparts if they have not been socialized in the same way?" is a great discussion point on this topic. It is interesting that girls who act like "tomboys" in grade school are looked down upon by some people, but when girls are un-athletic as teenagers or adults it is also looked at as being unattractive by some. This is creating a double-headed sword for women. Athletic abilities are mainly developed at a young age, yet girls are socially prevented from developing such skills. Yet when a female throws a ball in a very un-athletic manner after childhood, some men will make fun of them for their lack of grace in performing such a task. While watching "Chicks with Guns Means Disaster," some males would probably laugh at the lack of ability these females show when it comes to shooting firearms, however, it is those guys laughing that are exponentially fueling the fire for females to feel even more self-conscious when doing activities such as shooting a gun. I absolutely agree with Young that girls are not given the opportunity to use their full bodily capacities, and thus, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy involving women lacking the ability to perform bodily functions similar to men (i.e. throwing a ball, running, etc.).
ReplyDeleteWith the great connections you made to the piece I can get a better appreciation for the arguments raised by you. So, thanks again for cutting down on the "wordage" to make it readable. I completely agree (as would everyone else) that the construction and analyze of the female body in the social sphere has created disparities that cross over into the upbringing and over all physicality of how women use their bodies in these multiple realms. "Throwing like a girl" is a product of the objectification women face along with the cultural impact that is used regularly to diagnose women's bodies as incompetent. This is the fact that needs to be changed in our society. Its harmful and creates messed up realities that affect more than half the world's population.
ReplyDeleteSeeing gender as a social construction shows us that our conceptions of gender norms are capable of changing. If our gender norms create the gender roles that influence the development of our gender identity and displays then, as we have learned from previous readings, the social can influence the biological, emotional, psychological, and the body of the individual and legitimize/strengthen the social norms and structures. So by looking for gender differences, such as throwing styles, and using those differences to explain gender norms the gender structure is reinforced and the cycle continues. By saying that simple acts such as throwing styles are created by biological differences, providing different rules to women's softball, we tell women that there is nothing they can do to change and we help to squash deviance from the norms. The norms cause women to see and use their bodies differently, and women who challenge norms are seen as deviant and different instead of examples of how society could evolve its social constructs.
ReplyDelete